Subscribe
Technology

Nvidia's Jensen Huang quits after admitting an affair

Finance chief Colette Kress takes temporary control while an independent board inquiry into claims Huang was targeted by foreign intelligence remains open.

5 min read
Jensen Huang in a black leather jacket sits beside Alice Huang in a white jacket, both smiling
Digitally illustrated image.

TLDR

Jensen Huang resigned immediately as Nvidia's president, chief executive and director on 12 November after acknowledging an extramarital affair and an independent board investigation. Colette Kress becomes interim CEO while a permanent successor is sought, and a shareholder class action alleges disclosure failures.

Board accepts immediate resignation after 33-year tenure

Nvidia's board accepted the immediate resignation of founder Jen-Hsun Huang as president, chief executive and director on 12 November, ending a 33-year run at the helm of the world's most valuable semiconductor company.[1] Colette M. Kress, Nvidia's executive vice-president and chief financial officer, was appointed interim CEO and will hold both roles while the board considers internal and external candidates for the permanent position.[2]

Harvey C. Jones, a director since 1993, was simultaneously appointed to what Nvidia described as the company's first-ever board chair position.[2] No timeline for completing the permanent CEO search has been disclosed.

Kress said: "NVIDIA's strength has always come from its people, and together with our leadership team, I am committed to building on the extraordinary foundation Jensen created over the last 33 years."[2]

Huang acknowledges affair, investigation announced days earlier

Nvidia's board announced on 8 November that it had launched an independent investigation after reports Huang had been the target of a foreign intelligence effort.[3] A committee of independent directors and outside counsel was appointed to oversee the inquiry, and the board said at the time it had no reason to believe national security or Nvidia secrets had been compromised.[3]

Also on 8 November, Huang issued a public statement acknowledging the personal conduct at the centre of the inquiry. Huang said: "I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did. I am deeply sorry."[4] His published message did not name the other person or describe the relationship beyond that acknowledgement.

Congressional inquiry and the limits of the public record

Four days before the investigation was announced, House committee chairs Brian Mast, John Moolenaar and Rick Crawford wrote to Huang requesting a closed-door briefing on Nvidia's security protocols and his interactions with a person named Alice Huang.[5] Their letter described Alice Huang as a "publicly reported" People's Republic of China intelligence asset, language that attributes the espionage claim to public reporting rather than to an official intelligence finding.

Nvidia's own documents do not name Alice Huang or make any espionage finding, and the House committee's characterisation rests explicitly on what has been publicly reported rather than on a declassified or on-the-record government assessment.[5] The confirmed public record does not independently establish Alice Huang's role in the affair or her alleged intelligence activities.

Megaspeed denies wrongdoing, launches compliance review

Megaspeed, a company linked to the reporting, said it takes US export-control obligations "extremely seriously" and had cooperated with Bureau of Industry and Security inspections conducted by the US Commerce Department.[6] Megaspeed chairman and chief executive Tan Yong Pong, James said: "Compliance is a fundamental priority for the company, and Megaspeed is committed to working constructively and transparently with the U.S. government."[6]

Megaspeed said it had retained a US law firm to conduct an independent GPU census and verify its compliance practices.[6]

Shareholder class action alleges disclosure failures

A proposed federal shareholder class action, filed as Kistenmacher v. NVIDIA Corporation et al, alleges Nvidia and Huang made materially false or misleading statements by failing to disclose the alleged affair and the risks associated with Megaspeed.[7] Those allegations have not been tested in court and remain unproven.

The complaint alleges Nvidia shares fell US$7.97, or 4.27 per cent, to close at US$178.67 on 9 November, the day the investigation was first reported.[7] Nvidia's independent-director inquiry remains ongoing, with no findings released as of the date of the SEC filing disclosing Huang's departure.[1]

KEY TAKEAWAYS

01Huang resigned immediately as president, CEO and director on 12 November after Nvidia launched an independent investigation.
02Colette Kress will serve as both interim CEO and CFO while the board considers internal and external candidates.
03Harvey C. Jones, a director since 1993, became Nvidia's first-ever board chair upon Huang's departure.
04House committee chairs described Alice Huang as a 'publicly reported' Chinese intelligence asset, not an official finding.
05Nvidia shares fell US$7.97, or 4.27 per cent, to US$178.67 on 9 November, according to the proposed class action filing.
This article contains analysis and commentary on market conditions. It does not constitute financial, investment, or professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always consult a qualified adviser before making financial decisions.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Why did Jensen Huang resign from Nvidia?
Huang resigned on 12 November after Nvidia's board launched an independent investigation following reports he had been the target of a foreign intelligence effort. He publicly acknowledged an extramarital affair, saying his actions hurt his wife and children.
Who is running Nvidia now?
Colette Kress, the company's longtime chief financial officer, has been appointed interim CEO while the board searches for a permanent successor from both internal and external candidates. Harvey C. Jones became Nvidia's first-ever board chair.
What are the espionage claims and are they proven?
House committee chairs described Alice Huang as a 'publicly reported' Chinese intelligence asset in a letter requesting a congressional briefing. That characterisation is based on public reporting, not an official declassified intelligence finding. Nvidia's own documents do not name Alice Huang or make any espionage finding.
What is the shareholder class action about?
A proposed class action filed as Kistenmacher v. NVIDIA Corporation et al alleges that Nvidia and Huang failed to disclose the affair and associated risks. The allegations are unproven and have not been tested in court.
Related topics
What's your reaction?

Make us a preferred source on Google

Tap once and our reporting shows at the top of your Google search results and AI answers. You can change this at any time.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Subscribe — it's free